mirror of
https://github.com/pi-hole/dnsmasq.git
synced 2025-12-19 02:08:24 +00:00
Redesign the interaction between DNSSEC vaildation and per-domain servers.
This should just work in all cases now. If the normal chain-of-trust exists into the delegated domain then whether the domain is signed or not, DNSSEC validation will function normally. In the case the delgated domain is an "overlay" on top of the global DNS and no NS and/or DS records exist connecting it to the global dns, then if the domain is unsigned the situation will be handled by synthesising a proof-of-non-existance-of-DS for the domain and queries will be answered unvalidated; this action will be logged. A signed domain without chain-of-trust can be validated if a suitable trust-anchor is provided using --trust-anchor. Thanks to Uwe Kleine-König for prompting this change, and contributing valuable insights into what could be improved.
This commit is contained in:
16
CHANGELOG
16
CHANGELOG
@@ -1,3 +1,19 @@
|
||||
version 2.92
|
||||
Redesign the interaction between DNSSEC vaildation and per-domain
|
||||
servers, specified as --server=/<domain>/<ip-address>. This should
|
||||
just work in all cases now. If the normal chain-of-trust exists into
|
||||
the delegated domain then whether the domain is signed or not, DNSSEC
|
||||
validation will function normally. In the case the delgated domain
|
||||
is an "overlay" on top of the global DNS and no NS and/or DS records
|
||||
exist connecting it to the global dns, then if the domain is
|
||||
unsigned the situation will be handled by synthesising a
|
||||
proof-of-non-existance-of-DS for the domain and queries will be
|
||||
answered unvalidated; this action will be logged. A signed domain
|
||||
without chain-of-trust can be validated if a suitable trust-anchor
|
||||
is provided using --trust-anchor. This change should be backwards
|
||||
compatible for all existing working configurations; it extends the
|
||||
space of possible configurations which are functional.
|
||||
|
||||
version 2.91
|
||||
Fix spurious "resource limit exceeded messages". Thanks to
|
||||
Dominik Derigs for the bug report.
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user