Simplify rrset_canonical_order() with new canonicalization functions.

This commit is contained in:
Giovanni Bajo
2012-05-02 00:31:19 +02:00
committed by Simon Kelley
parent 4885d57c58
commit da23c4f960

View File

@@ -353,54 +353,34 @@ struct {
static int rrset_canonical_order(const void *r1, const void *r2)
{
size_t r1len, r2len;
int rrtype, i;
int rrtype;
unsigned char *pr1=*(unsigned char**)r1, *pr2=*(unsigned char**)r2;
unsigned char tmp1[MAXCDNAME], tmp2[MAXCDNAME]; /* TODO: use part of daemon->namebuff */
#define ORDER(buf1,len1, buf2,len2) \
do { \
int res = memcmp(buf1, buf2, MIN(len1,len2)); \
if (res != 0) return res; \
if (len1 < len2) return -1; \
if (len1 > len2) return 1; \
} while (0)
GETSHORT(rrtype, pr1);
pr1 += 6; pr2 += 8;
GETSHORT(r1len, pr1); GETSHORT(r2len, pr2);
if (rrtype < countof(rdata_description))
for (i = 0; rdata_description[rrtype][i] != RDESC_END; ++i)
{
int d = rdata_description[rrtype][i];
if (d == RDESC_DOMAIN)
{
int dl1 = process_domain_name(rrset_canonical_order_ctx.header, rrset_canonical_order_ctx.pktlen,
&pr1, &r1len, tmp1, PWN_EXTRACT);
int dl2 = process_domain_name(rrset_canonical_order_ctx.header, rrset_canonical_order_ctx.pktlen,
&pr2, &r2len, tmp2, PWN_EXTRACT);
/* TODO: how do we handle errors, that is dl1==0 or dl2==0 ? */
assert(dl1 != 0);
assert(dl2 != 0);
ORDER(tmp1, dl1, tmp2, dl2);
}
else
{
ORDER(pr1, d, pr2, d);
pr1 += d; pr2 += d;
r1len -= d; r2len -= d;
}
}
RDataCForm cf1, cf2;
rdata_cform_init(&cf1, rrset_canonical_order_ctx.header, rrset_canonical_order_ctx.pktlen,
pr1, rrtype, tmp1);
rdata_cform_init(&cf2, rrset_canonical_order_ctx.header, rrset_canonical_order_ctx.pktlen,
pr2, rrtype, tmp2);
while ((pr1 = rdata_cform_next(&cf1, &r1len)) &&
(pr2 = rdata_cform_next(&cf2, &r2len)))
{
int res = memcmp(pr1, pr2, MIN(r1len,r2len));
if (res != 0)
return res;
if (r1len < r2len)
return -1;
if (r2len > r1len)
return 1;
}
/* Order the rest of the record. */
ORDER(pr1, r1len, pr2, r2len);
/* If we reached this point, the two RRs are identical.
/* If we reached this point, the two RRs are identical (or an error occurred).
RFC2181 says that an RRset is not allowed to contain duplicate
records. If it happens, it is a protocol error and anything goes. */
return 1;
#undef ORDER
}
typedef struct PendingRRSIGValidation