Use the SHA-256 hash function to verify that DNS answers
received are for the questions originally asked. This replaces
the slightly insecure SHA-1 (when compiled with DNSSEC) or
the very insecure CRC32 (otherwise). Refer: CERT VU#434904.
Make the existing "insecure DS received" warning more informative by
reporting the domain name reporting the issue.
This may help identify a problem with a specific domain or server
configuration.
Signed-off-by: Kevin Darbyshire-Bryant <ldir@darbyshire-bryant.me.uk>
In a reply proving that a DS doesn't exist, it doesn't matter if RRs
in the auth section _other_ than NSEC/NSEC3 are not signed. We can't
set the AD flag when returning the query, but it still proves
that the DS doesn't exist for internal use.
As one of the RRs which may not be signed is the SOA record, use the
TTL of the NSEC record to cache the negative result, not one
derived from the SOA.
Thanks to Tore Anderson for spotting and diagnosing the bug.
This moves the class argument to cache-insert into an argument,
rather then overloading a union in the address argument. Note that
tha class is NOT stored in the cache other than for DS/DNSKEY entries,
so must always be C_IN except for these. The data-extraction code
ensures this as it only attempts to cache C_IN class records.
It's OK for NSEC records to be expanded from wildcards,
but in that case, the proof of non-existence is only valid
starting at the wildcard name, *.<domain> NOT the name expanded
from the wildcard. Without this check it's possible for an
attacker to craft an NSEC which wrongly proves non-existence
in a domain which includes a wildcard for NSEC.
RFC 4034 says:
[RFC2181] specifies that an RRset is not allowed to contain duplicate
records (multiple RRs with the same owner name, class, type, and
RDATA). Therefore, if an implementation detects duplicate RRs when
putting the RRset in canonical form, it MUST treat this as a protocol
error. If the implementation chooses to handle this protocol error
in the spirit of the robustness principle (being liberal in what it
accepts), it MUST remove all but one of the duplicate RR(s) for the
purposes of calculating the canonical form of the RRset.
We chose to handle this robustly, having found at least one recursive
server in the wild which returns duplicate NSEC records in the AUTHORITY
section of an answer generated from a wildcard record. sort_rrset() is
therefore modified to delete duplicate RRs which are detected almost
for free during the bubble-sort process.
Thanks to Toralf Förster for helping to diagnose this problem.
The current logic is naive in the case that there is more than
one RRset in an answer (Typically, when a non-CNAME query is answered
by one or more CNAME RRs, and then then an answer RRset.)
If all the RRsets validate, then they are cached and marked as validated,
but if any RRset doesn't validate, then the AD flag is not set (good) and
ALL the RRsets are cached marked as not validated.
This breaks when, eg, the answer contains a validated CNAME, pointing
to a non-validated answer. A subsequent query for the CNAME without do
will get an answer with the AD flag wrongly reset, and worse, the same
query with do will get a cached answer without RRSIGS, rather than
being forwarded.
The code now records the validation of individual RRsets and that
is used to correctly set the "validated" bits in the cache entries.
Fix heap overflow in DNS code. This is a potentially serious
security hole. It allows an attacker who can make DNS
requests to dnsmasq, and who controls the contents of
a domain, which is thereby queried, to overflow
(by 2 bytes) a heap buffer and either crash, or
even take control of, dnsmasq.
