mirror of
https://github.com/signalapp/Signal-Android.git
synced 2026-04-20 16:49:40 +01:00
Add PNP change number insert events and tests.
This commit is contained in:
committed by
Cody Henthorne
parent
433b5ebc13
commit
739a8e9451
@@ -12,16 +12,22 @@ import org.signal.core.util.requireLong
|
||||
import org.signal.core.util.requireString
|
||||
import org.signal.core.util.select
|
||||
import org.thoughtcrime.securesms.keyvalue.SignalStore
|
||||
import org.thoughtcrime.securesms.recipients.Recipient
|
||||
import org.thoughtcrime.securesms.recipients.RecipientId
|
||||
import org.thoughtcrime.securesms.sms.IncomingEncryptedMessage
|
||||
import org.thoughtcrime.securesms.sms.IncomingTextMessage
|
||||
import org.whispersystems.signalservice.api.push.ACI
|
||||
import org.whispersystems.signalservice.api.push.PNI
|
||||
import org.whispersystems.signalservice.api.push.ServiceId
|
||||
import java.util.Optional
|
||||
import java.util.UUID
|
||||
|
||||
@RunWith(AndroidJUnit4::class)
|
||||
class RecipientDatabaseTest_processPnpTuple {
|
||||
|
||||
private lateinit var recipientDatabase: RecipientDatabase
|
||||
private lateinit var smsDatabase: SmsDatabase
|
||||
private lateinit var threadDatabase: ThreadDatabase
|
||||
|
||||
private val localAci = ACI.from(UUID.randomUUID())
|
||||
private val localPni = PNI.from(UUID.randomUUID())
|
||||
@@ -29,6 +35,8 @@ class RecipientDatabaseTest_processPnpTuple {
|
||||
@Before
|
||||
fun setup() {
|
||||
recipientDatabase = SignalDatabase.recipients
|
||||
smsDatabase = SignalDatabase.sms
|
||||
threadDatabase = SignalDatabase.threads
|
||||
|
||||
ensureDbEmpty()
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -180,11 +188,12 @@ class RecipientDatabaseTest_processPnpTuple {
|
||||
fun onlyPniMatches_noExistingPniSession_changeNumber() {
|
||||
// This test, I could go either way. We decide to change the E164 on the existing row rather than create a new one.
|
||||
// But it's an "unstable E164->PNI mapping" case, which we don't expect, so as long as there's a user-visible impact that should be fine.
|
||||
// TODO Verify change number
|
||||
test {
|
||||
given(E164_B, PNI_A, null)
|
||||
given(E164_B, PNI_A, null, createThread = true)
|
||||
process(E164_A, PNI_A, ACI_A)
|
||||
expect(E164_A, PNI_A, ACI_A)
|
||||
|
||||
expectChangeNumberEvent()
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -192,21 +201,23 @@ class RecipientDatabaseTest_processPnpTuple {
|
||||
fun pniAndAciMatches_changeNumber() {
|
||||
// This test, I could go either way. We decide to change the E164 on the existing row rather than create a new one.
|
||||
// But it's an "unstable E164->PNI mapping" case, which we don't expect, so as long as there's a user-visible impact that should be fine.
|
||||
// TODO Verify change number
|
||||
test {
|
||||
given(E164_B, PNI_A, ACI_A)
|
||||
given(E164_B, PNI_A, ACI_A, createThread = true)
|
||||
process(E164_A, PNI_A, ACI_A)
|
||||
expect(E164_A, PNI_A, ACI_A)
|
||||
|
||||
expectChangeNumberEvent()
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
@Test
|
||||
fun onlyAciMatches_changeNumber() {
|
||||
// TODO Verify change number
|
||||
test {
|
||||
given(E164_B, null, ACI_A)
|
||||
given(E164_B, null, ACI_A, createThread = true)
|
||||
process(E164_A, PNI_A, ACI_A)
|
||||
expect(E164_A, PNI_A, ACI_A)
|
||||
|
||||
expectChangeNumberEvent()
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -318,29 +329,31 @@ class RecipientDatabaseTest_processPnpTuple {
|
||||
|
||||
@Test
|
||||
fun merge_e164AndPni_e164AndPniAndAci_changeNumber() {
|
||||
// TODO Verify change number
|
||||
test {
|
||||
given(E164_A, PNI_A, null)
|
||||
given(E164_B, PNI_B, ACI_A)
|
||||
given(E164_B, PNI_B, ACI_A, createThread = true)
|
||||
|
||||
process(E164_A, PNI_A, ACI_A)
|
||||
|
||||
expectDeleted()
|
||||
expect(E164_A, PNI_A, ACI_A)
|
||||
|
||||
expectChangeNumberEvent()
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
@Test
|
||||
fun merge_e164AndPni_e164Aci_changeNumber() {
|
||||
// TODO Verify change number
|
||||
test {
|
||||
given(E164_A, PNI_A, null)
|
||||
given(E164_B, null, ACI_A)
|
||||
given(E164_B, null, ACI_A, createThread = true)
|
||||
|
||||
process(E164_A, PNI_A, ACI_A)
|
||||
|
||||
expectDeleted()
|
||||
expect(E164_A, PNI_A, ACI_A)
|
||||
|
||||
expectChangeNumberEvent()
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -402,15 +415,23 @@ class RecipientDatabaseTest_processPnpTuple {
|
||||
private inner class TestCase {
|
||||
private val generatedIds: LinkedHashSet<RecipientId> = LinkedHashSet()
|
||||
private var expectCount = 0
|
||||
private lateinit var outputRecipientId: RecipientId
|
||||
|
||||
fun given(e164: String?, pni: PNI?, aci: ACI?) {
|
||||
generatedIds += insert(e164, pni, aci)
|
||||
fun given(e164: String?, pni: PNI?, aci: ACI?, createThread: Boolean = false) {
|
||||
val id = insert(e164, pni, aci)
|
||||
generatedIds += id
|
||||
if (createThread) {
|
||||
// Create a thread and throw a dummy message in it so it doesn't get automatically deleted
|
||||
threadDatabase.getOrCreateThreadIdFor(Recipient.resolved(id))
|
||||
smsDatabase.insertMessageInbox(IncomingEncryptedMessage(IncomingTextMessage(id, 1, 0, 0, 0, "", Optional.empty(), 0, false, ""), ""))
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
fun process(e164: String?, pni: PNI?, aci: ACI?) {
|
||||
SignalDatabase.rawDatabase.beginTransaction()
|
||||
try {
|
||||
generatedIds += recipientDatabase.processPnpTuple(e164, pni, aci, pniVerified = false).finalId
|
||||
outputRecipientId = recipientDatabase.processPnpTuple(e164, pni, aci, pniVerified = false).finalId
|
||||
generatedIds += outputRecipientId
|
||||
SignalDatabase.rawDatabase.setTransactionSuccessful()
|
||||
} finally {
|
||||
SignalDatabase.rawDatabase.endTransaction()
|
||||
@@ -435,6 +456,10 @@ class RecipientDatabaseTest_processPnpTuple {
|
||||
fun expectDeleted(id: RecipientId) {
|
||||
assertNull(get(id))
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
fun expectChangeNumberEvent() {
|
||||
assertEquals(1, smsDatabase.getChangeNumberMessageCount(outputRecipientId))
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
private data class IdRecord(
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user