Add PNP change number insert events and tests.

This commit is contained in:
Greyson Parrelli
2022-11-07 19:11:54 -05:00
committed by Cody Henthorne
parent 433b5ebc13
commit 739a8e9451
6 changed files with 77 additions and 28 deletions

View File

@@ -12,16 +12,22 @@ import org.signal.core.util.requireLong
import org.signal.core.util.requireString
import org.signal.core.util.select
import org.thoughtcrime.securesms.keyvalue.SignalStore
import org.thoughtcrime.securesms.recipients.Recipient
import org.thoughtcrime.securesms.recipients.RecipientId
import org.thoughtcrime.securesms.sms.IncomingEncryptedMessage
import org.thoughtcrime.securesms.sms.IncomingTextMessage
import org.whispersystems.signalservice.api.push.ACI
import org.whispersystems.signalservice.api.push.PNI
import org.whispersystems.signalservice.api.push.ServiceId
import java.util.Optional
import java.util.UUID
@RunWith(AndroidJUnit4::class)
class RecipientDatabaseTest_processPnpTuple {
private lateinit var recipientDatabase: RecipientDatabase
private lateinit var smsDatabase: SmsDatabase
private lateinit var threadDatabase: ThreadDatabase
private val localAci = ACI.from(UUID.randomUUID())
private val localPni = PNI.from(UUID.randomUUID())
@@ -29,6 +35,8 @@ class RecipientDatabaseTest_processPnpTuple {
@Before
fun setup() {
recipientDatabase = SignalDatabase.recipients
smsDatabase = SignalDatabase.sms
threadDatabase = SignalDatabase.threads
ensureDbEmpty()
@@ -180,11 +188,12 @@ class RecipientDatabaseTest_processPnpTuple {
fun onlyPniMatches_noExistingPniSession_changeNumber() {
// This test, I could go either way. We decide to change the E164 on the existing row rather than create a new one.
// But it's an "unstable E164->PNI mapping" case, which we don't expect, so as long as there's a user-visible impact that should be fine.
// TODO Verify change number
test {
given(E164_B, PNI_A, null)
given(E164_B, PNI_A, null, createThread = true)
process(E164_A, PNI_A, ACI_A)
expect(E164_A, PNI_A, ACI_A)
expectChangeNumberEvent()
}
}
@@ -192,21 +201,23 @@ class RecipientDatabaseTest_processPnpTuple {
fun pniAndAciMatches_changeNumber() {
// This test, I could go either way. We decide to change the E164 on the existing row rather than create a new one.
// But it's an "unstable E164->PNI mapping" case, which we don't expect, so as long as there's a user-visible impact that should be fine.
// TODO Verify change number
test {
given(E164_B, PNI_A, ACI_A)
given(E164_B, PNI_A, ACI_A, createThread = true)
process(E164_A, PNI_A, ACI_A)
expect(E164_A, PNI_A, ACI_A)
expectChangeNumberEvent()
}
}
@Test
fun onlyAciMatches_changeNumber() {
// TODO Verify change number
test {
given(E164_B, null, ACI_A)
given(E164_B, null, ACI_A, createThread = true)
process(E164_A, PNI_A, ACI_A)
expect(E164_A, PNI_A, ACI_A)
expectChangeNumberEvent()
}
}
@@ -318,29 +329,31 @@ class RecipientDatabaseTest_processPnpTuple {
@Test
fun merge_e164AndPni_e164AndPniAndAci_changeNumber() {
// TODO Verify change number
test {
given(E164_A, PNI_A, null)
given(E164_B, PNI_B, ACI_A)
given(E164_B, PNI_B, ACI_A, createThread = true)
process(E164_A, PNI_A, ACI_A)
expectDeleted()
expect(E164_A, PNI_A, ACI_A)
expectChangeNumberEvent()
}
}
@Test
fun merge_e164AndPni_e164Aci_changeNumber() {
// TODO Verify change number
test {
given(E164_A, PNI_A, null)
given(E164_B, null, ACI_A)
given(E164_B, null, ACI_A, createThread = true)
process(E164_A, PNI_A, ACI_A)
expectDeleted()
expect(E164_A, PNI_A, ACI_A)
expectChangeNumberEvent()
}
}
@@ -402,15 +415,23 @@ class RecipientDatabaseTest_processPnpTuple {
private inner class TestCase {
private val generatedIds: LinkedHashSet<RecipientId> = LinkedHashSet()
private var expectCount = 0
private lateinit var outputRecipientId: RecipientId
fun given(e164: String?, pni: PNI?, aci: ACI?) {
generatedIds += insert(e164, pni, aci)
fun given(e164: String?, pni: PNI?, aci: ACI?, createThread: Boolean = false) {
val id = insert(e164, pni, aci)
generatedIds += id
if (createThread) {
// Create a thread and throw a dummy message in it so it doesn't get automatically deleted
threadDatabase.getOrCreateThreadIdFor(Recipient.resolved(id))
smsDatabase.insertMessageInbox(IncomingEncryptedMessage(IncomingTextMessage(id, 1, 0, 0, 0, "", Optional.empty(), 0, false, ""), ""))
}
}
fun process(e164: String?, pni: PNI?, aci: ACI?) {
SignalDatabase.rawDatabase.beginTransaction()
try {
generatedIds += recipientDatabase.processPnpTuple(e164, pni, aci, pniVerified = false).finalId
outputRecipientId = recipientDatabase.processPnpTuple(e164, pni, aci, pniVerified = false).finalId
generatedIds += outputRecipientId
SignalDatabase.rawDatabase.setTransactionSuccessful()
} finally {
SignalDatabase.rawDatabase.endTransaction()
@@ -435,6 +456,10 @@ class RecipientDatabaseTest_processPnpTuple {
fun expectDeleted(id: RecipientId) {
assertNull(get(id))
}
fun expectChangeNumberEvent() {
assertEquals(1, smsDatabase.getChangeNumberMessageCount(outputRecipientId))
}
}
private data class IdRecord(