mirror of
https://github.com/signalapp/Signal-Android.git
synced 2025-12-26 05:58:09 +00:00
Do not double-insert change number events.
This commit is contained in:
@@ -12,7 +12,6 @@ import org.junit.Before
|
||||
import org.junit.Test
|
||||
import org.junit.runner.RunWith
|
||||
import org.signal.core.util.CursorUtil
|
||||
import org.signal.core.util.ThreadUtil
|
||||
import org.signal.libsignal.protocol.IdentityKey
|
||||
import org.signal.libsignal.protocol.SignalProtocolAddress
|
||||
import org.signal.libsignal.protocol.state.SessionRecord
|
||||
@@ -26,9 +25,7 @@ import org.thoughtcrime.securesms.database.model.Mention
|
||||
import org.thoughtcrime.securesms.database.model.MessageId
|
||||
import org.thoughtcrime.securesms.database.model.MessageRecord
|
||||
import org.thoughtcrime.securesms.database.model.ReactionRecord
|
||||
import org.thoughtcrime.securesms.dependencies.ApplicationDependencies
|
||||
import org.thoughtcrime.securesms.groups.GroupId
|
||||
import org.thoughtcrime.securesms.jobs.RecipientChangedNumberJob
|
||||
import org.thoughtcrime.securesms.keyvalue.AccountValues
|
||||
import org.thoughtcrime.securesms.keyvalue.KeyValueDataSet
|
||||
import org.thoughtcrime.securesms.keyvalue.KeyValueStore
|
||||
@@ -229,9 +226,6 @@ class RecipientDatabaseTest_getAndPossiblyMerge {
|
||||
/** Merge two different users into one. You should prefer the ACI user. Not shown: merging threads, dropping e164 sessions, etc. */
|
||||
@Test
|
||||
fun getAndPossiblyMerge_bothAciAndE164MapToExistingUser_aciAndE164_merge() {
|
||||
val changeNumberListener = ChangeNumberListener()
|
||||
changeNumberListener.enqueue()
|
||||
|
||||
val existingAciId: RecipientId = recipientDatabase.getAndPossiblyMerge(ACI_A, null)
|
||||
val existingE164Id: RecipientId = recipientDatabase.getAndPossiblyMerge(null, E164_A)
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -245,16 +239,12 @@ class RecipientDatabaseTest_getAndPossiblyMerge {
|
||||
val existingE164Recipient = Recipient.resolved(existingE164Id)
|
||||
assertEquals(mergedId, existingE164Recipient.id)
|
||||
|
||||
changeNumberListener.waitForJobManager()
|
||||
assertFalse(changeNumberListener.numberChangeWasEnqueued)
|
||||
// TODO [greyson] Change number
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/** Same as [getAndPossiblyMerge_bothAciAndE164MapToExistingUser_aciAndE164_merge], but with a number change. */
|
||||
@Test
|
||||
fun getAndPossiblyMerge_bothAciAndE164MapToExistingUser_aciAndE164_merge_changedNumber() {
|
||||
val changeNumberListener = ChangeNumberListener()
|
||||
changeNumberListener.enqueue()
|
||||
|
||||
val existingAciId: RecipientId = recipientDatabase.getAndPossiblyMerge(ACI_A, E164_B)
|
||||
val existingE164Id: RecipientId = recipientDatabase.getAndPossiblyMerge(null, E164_A)
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -268,16 +258,12 @@ class RecipientDatabaseTest_getAndPossiblyMerge {
|
||||
val existingE164Recipient = Recipient.resolved(existingE164Id)
|
||||
assertEquals(retrievedId, existingE164Recipient.id)
|
||||
|
||||
changeNumberListener.waitForJobManager()
|
||||
assert(changeNumberListener.numberChangeWasEnqueued)
|
||||
// TODO [greyson] Change number
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/** No new rules here, just a more complex scenario to show how different rules interact. */
|
||||
@Test
|
||||
fun getAndPossiblyMerge_bothAciAndE164MapToExistingUser_aciAndE164_complex() {
|
||||
val changeNumberListener = ChangeNumberListener()
|
||||
changeNumberListener.enqueue()
|
||||
|
||||
val existingId1: RecipientId = recipientDatabase.getAndPossiblyMerge(ACI_A, E164_B)
|
||||
val existingId2: RecipientId = recipientDatabase.getAndPossiblyMerge(ACI_B, E164_A)
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -292,8 +278,7 @@ class RecipientDatabaseTest_getAndPossiblyMerge {
|
||||
assertEquals(ACI_B, existingRecipient2.requireServiceId())
|
||||
assertFalse(existingRecipient2.hasE164())
|
||||
|
||||
changeNumberListener.waitForJobManager()
|
||||
assert(changeNumberListener.numberChangeWasEnqueued)
|
||||
// TODO [greyson] Change number
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/**
|
||||
@@ -383,9 +368,6 @@ class RecipientDatabaseTest_getAndPossiblyMerge {
|
||||
/** Verifying a case where a change number job is expected to be enqueued. */
|
||||
@Test
|
||||
fun getAndPossiblyMerge_aciMapsToExistingUserButE164DoesNot_changedNumber() {
|
||||
val changeNumberListener = ChangeNumberListener()
|
||||
changeNumberListener.enqueue()
|
||||
|
||||
val existingId: RecipientId = recipientDatabase.getAndPossiblyMerge(ACI_A, E164_A)
|
||||
|
||||
val retrievedId: RecipientId = recipientDatabase.getAndPossiblyMerge(ACI_A, E164_B)
|
||||
@@ -395,8 +377,7 @@ class RecipientDatabaseTest_getAndPossiblyMerge {
|
||||
assertEquals(ACI_A, retrievedRecipient.requireServiceId())
|
||||
assertEquals(E164_B, retrievedRecipient.requireE164())
|
||||
|
||||
changeNumberListener.waitForJobManager()
|
||||
assert(changeNumberListener.numberChangeWasEnqueued)
|
||||
// TODO [greyson] Change number
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/** High trust lets you merge two different users into one. You should prefer the ACI user. Not shown: merging threads, dropping e164 sessions, etc. */
|
||||
@@ -630,24 +611,6 @@ class RecipientDatabaseTest_getAndPossiblyMerge {
|
||||
val threadId: Long
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
private class ChangeNumberListener {
|
||||
|
||||
var numberChangeWasEnqueued = false
|
||||
private set
|
||||
|
||||
fun waitForJobManager() {
|
||||
ApplicationDependencies.getJobManager().flush()
|
||||
ThreadUtil.sleep(500)
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
fun enqueue() {
|
||||
ApplicationDependencies.getJobManager().addListener(
|
||||
{ job -> job.factoryKey == RecipientChangedNumberJob.KEY },
|
||||
{ _, _ -> numberChangeWasEnqueued = true }
|
||||
)
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
companion object {
|
||||
val ACI_A = ACI.from(UUID.fromString("3436efbe-5a76-47fa-a98a-7e72c948a82e"))
|
||||
val ACI_B = ACI.from(UUID.fromString("8de7f691-0b60-4a68-9cd9-ed2f8453f9ed"))
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user